Hi there,
I was browsing on the lichess website, when I came upon the most active players page, and noticed @german11 has played for more than 625 days on lichess.
Impressive!
According to some study you become a master on the field after 10,000+ of practice.
But sadly it doesn't seem german11 is improving, while I know bullet / blitz aren't well renowed to improve your game. I was wondering why this bruteforce method doesn't seem to help.
This is by no mean to diminish the player but to bring understanding.
Would I improve in blitz and bullet by playing 100k games ? or it wouldn't be an efficient way to drastically improve.
Why doesn't this method seems to work, is it because no one analyze their bullet / blitz games ? or is it pointless to analyze those game ?
Waiting for your answers
I was browsing on the lichess website, when I came upon the most active players page, and noticed @german11 has played for more than 625 days on lichess.
Impressive!
According to some study you become a master on the field after 10,000+ of practice.
But sadly it doesn't seem german11 is improving, while I know bullet / blitz aren't well renowed to improve your game. I was wondering why this bruteforce method doesn't seem to help.
This is by no mean to diminish the player but to bring understanding.
Would I improve in blitz and bullet by playing 100k games ? or it wouldn't be an efficient way to drastically improve.
Why doesn't this method seems to work, is it because no one analyze their bullet / blitz games ? or is it pointless to analyze those game ?
Waiting for your answers