lichess.org
Donate

Lichess Bans Keyboard

@HyperCloxy

"1.Pro-kb solution is the current one."
Aghm, I know this might sound off, but I use old keyboard and get flagged by multi premoves
Now I'm ok with getting flagged by people somehow faster than be all be it with seemingly less practice than me.

And pro-KB might mean something else than what you think it does because the Idea of multi was for I'd say a lot of people like very weird idea since lichess didn't implement multi themselves and so I'm surprised nobody really challenged it when it came out and instead just focused on the KB aspect of it.

because I might shuffle the mouse around the board 1 square at a premove,
but with multi each physical shuffle registers 3 moves and I mean mathematically it's just soo fast.

But in any case yeah It is true that your mouse skills are less appreciated due to KB's outshining you
but maybe if you also had multi premoves on your mouse you'd do better somehow so maybe if we could get multi for all that's a step in a better direction would you say?
@HyperCloxy said in #98:
> Firstly, I still do not get why there is such a huge discussion about keyboard being fair or not. I mean it does not make any sense to play competitive speed chess with different input methods and different connections. Now people will say that there is always a difference because some people have a better mouse / mousepad and others have a worse setup. But from my experience the difference between good and bad mouse is super small compared to the huge difference between keyboard and mouse. And with such a huge difference it does not make sense to play competitive in my view. It's like racing in formula 1 with a normal car. You can still win with a normal car but nobody will do it because you are not competitive. And that's why there are extra races for normal cars because driving normal cars requires a different skill than driving formula 1 car.
>
> So, if you want to make keyboard and mouse players happy you have to implement something like kb-only and mouse-only tournaments/matchmaking. But I am pretty sure this won't happen so you have to decide whether mouse players or keyboard players are more important for lichess speed chess.
>
> 1.Pro-kb solution is the current one.
> 2.Pro-mouse solution would be ban kb.
>
> Both are bad solutions in my view because a huge amount of players is excluded with one of the solutions. (1 forces mouse players to use kb to be competitive / 2 forces kb players to use mouse) Because there is huge community for both input methods I would really appreciate lichess to split ultrabullet/hyperbullet to no-kb/everything allowed.
>
> I am mouse player and there is only (!) one reason why I do not like keyboard and it is the fact that being very fast with mouse is not rewarding at all on lichess but it was a core part of being good in ultra/hyperbullet in the earlier days before kb grew up. It's just kinda sad that this skill got partly useless.

I agree on some parts and disagree on others.

I like the solution you propose. To combat @MaximF42 s objection, I would use the following plan.

1. Implement keyboard into lichess, officially. I'm sure BerserkAsIfUWereMad and thibault could sort this out, considering the code pretty much exists already and must be merged with lichess. It's not a matter of 5 minutes, but its doable
2. Create seperate tournaments for mouse which you cannot join if you have keyboard enabled through lichess settings. This is also doable, most games have that, for example, you get entirely different lobbies in GTA Online, depending on free aim and assisted aim. I think they did it very smart, that way they avoid people using aimbots.

Now, you say that mouse speed is not important anymore with keyboard. I don't necessarily think that is a bad thing. Every sport goes through development and changing and other qualities get more important than others. Here's a few examples:

- In swimming, there are different techniques. The most effective one is crawling. Of course, people who learned and mastered other techniques are at a disadvantage in freestyle swimming, but theres also seperate competitions.
- In ski jumping, people used to hold their ski parallel. Then it was discovered that bringing them into a V-shape enhances the jump. Of course, everyone using the parallel style was then at a disadvantage, but instead of whining about it, they learned the new style and were successful. For example, there's Noriaki Kasai, who is 49 years old and still active at world cup level. He mastered the new style, despite already being good at the old one.
- In soccer, people used to play with regular shoes. Now there's special soccer shoes which have more grip. That means that balancing skills and staying on your feet on wet ground is not so difficult anymore.

What I'm trying to say is that it's a development in ultrabullet chess, and I don't think it's a bad one. I don't think ultrabullet should be all about mousespeed, I think it should be about who can think faster, who can make smart premoves to surprise the opponent, who can play better chess after all. I think keyboard vs keyboard games are the ones that get the closest to this ideal. Of course, mouse vs keyboard doesnt fit there really, but I don't think thats the keyboarders fault.

It's like a breaststroke swimmer in freestyle complaining that another swimmer uses crawling.
I'm just trying to be neutral here... What about telling the opponent if KB extension is installed and let the players decide if they want to play an KB extension player or not or adding a (kb) rating for those who enjoyed it. After all we are just trying to know what our real level is here. I'm just reading why I'm soo bad at ultrabullet & why my rating when to 1664 to 1200 in ultrabullet. I'm just a chess player without any assistance who is enjoying more honest bullet game. Have a nice day guys !
@TAUTKUS said in #1:
> Have they? No, But Ultra is a premove game and you have to see everything coming
> [Edit: Keyboard is a browser extension used in Lichess to modify the input method which is in question now]
>
> I'd like to dig into some background as to what Lichess even means for me,
> I only joined Lichess because I heard Magnus complain about a particular popular chess site (cough com cough) I was on saying: "It's like I am dragging my pieces through the mud"
>
> I loved speed and optimization and that's what I've found here well before I did Keyboard.
>
> Lichess for me was the Li like Lite, or Li a Chinese unit of measure which equates to half a KM, a minimalization have you.
> Now wistdanding I'm aware that the meaning may be of some French origin unknown to me.
>
> Why I'd miss keyboard:
> It gives the user in this case me, Full confidence to execute any series of moves within no confine of time,
> 3 seconds in an endgame is like an eternity during which you have plenty of eternity to promote or capture opponents pieces.
>
> There is also the more crude manner of which I've used it and it was as such "moving back and forth with a million pieces in a time scramble" which for most people without extreme speeds is impossible to defend against.
>
> But the negatives and positives combined are why I love KB, it changes things so far from the common conventional chess we are all familiar with thus giving rise and a chance to the weaker players like me who just want to go bezerk and be glad about a totally savage win or play an immortal game at such speeds you'd think we've become one with the computer.
>
> Now to the best of my knowledge this is a draft of what Lichess may want to implement and I'd like to state it and comment on it.:
>
> Firstly on a logistical level boils down to this:
> "We prohibit the use of any program or browser extension that assists with playing moves. " now I'm not going to hire a lawyer to claim that kb doesn't assist I think we understand what they're implying and kb should be taken as a defined
> move-assist under these possible guidelines.
>
> logistics aside now there ""reasoning""
> "Extensions that assist with playing moves have denatured fast chess to the point that many players won't play it anymore. We believe that banning keyboard extensions will result in UltraBullet and HyperBullet becoming more popular."
>
> now I don't want to over analyse or make many comments on that seeing as it's a draft on there end.
> But I'll lead with this Who's the benefactor of these KB extensions are they sick deviants or just very invested users?
>
> I'm not alone in using the kb extension many others have been using it for years just like me the extension page on chrome
> has over 1,000 downloads.
> Even for me without Keyboard this is still a very good bullet / hyper scene
> in which Lichess maintains fluidity and smooth game play experience.
>
> In any case I just hope they don't try to fully close the already opened Pandora's box of KB extensions.
> Lichess has N options here but I do want to note that it is indeed complicated but when and how they decide I'll respect.

furthermore see your paragraph about the more 'crude' use of KB. in your first post on this thread, says it all doesn't it?
@bibbymove

I think you're starting to understand that I'm not all black and white. And it wasn't some mistake that I wrote an honest letter is it so hard to believe?

So maybe take it at face value and I mean then there isn't really as many questions just suggestions and furthering of discussions which we're thankfully welcome to do 11 pages in and our topic is not closed which is quite nice.
@TAUTKUS said in #106:
> @bibbymove
>
> I think you're starting to understand that I'm not all black and white. And it wasn't some mistake that I wrote an honest letter is it so hard to believe?
>
> So maybe take it at face value and I mean then there isn't really as many questions just suggestions and furthering of discussions which we're thankfully welcome to do 11 pages in and our topic is not closed which is quite nice.

Quite unclear what you're saying. So you agree that KB gives an unfair advantage over legitimate players?
@bibbymove

I'm saying it has the ability to allow a player to make perfect moves so fast but also the ability to make crude moves of a less chessy nature and that's a negative but the whole mixture is a positive because it's so far from reality.

I get stormed flagged by kids with multi premoves so I somehow understand the feeling but still love the game.

I know it's confusing I'm just mentioning a few facts within reach and just giving my take on it which can be viewed differently somewhat but that's just what it is.
@clasherbabo said in #102:
> I agree on some parts and disagree on others.
>
> I like the solution you propose. To combat @MaximF42 s objection, I would use the following plan.
>
> 1. Implement keyboard into lichess, officially. I'm sure BerserkAsIfUWereMad and thibault could sort this out, considering the code pretty much exists already and must be merged with lichess. It's not a matter of 5 minutes, but its doable
> 2. Create seperate tournaments for mouse which you cannot join if you have keyboard enabled through lichess settings. This is also doable, most games have that, for example, you get entirely different lobbies in GTA Online, depending on free aim and assisted aim. I think they did it very smart, that way they avoid people using aimbots.

Is it possible to take away an extension from everyone using it? This is a very possible plan. All we need to do is to send this to those 2 players and it should work out! I don't see why not

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.